Back to enarahealth.com Enara for patients

A Digital Cardiology-Embedded Obesity Platform Produces Sustained Clinical and Financial Outcomes, Redefining Cardiovascular Prevention

Authors: M. Rami Bailony 1,4 Hassan Kafri 2 Patricia Dizon 3,4
  1. 1 University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA, USA
  2. 2 University of Damascus , Damascus, Syria
  3. 3 University of Santo Tomas , Manila, Philippines
  4. 4 Enara Health , San Mateo, CA, USA

Background

Obesity is a major contributor to cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. Despite this, cardiology practices often lack structured tools to address obesity as a modifiable risk factor. We evaluated the clinical and financial impact of a digitally delivered, multidisciplinary obesity care platform embedded within cardiology clinics.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed outcomes from 2,400 adults with obesity enrolled in a digital-first, cardiology-integrated obesity management program. The intervention included physician-directed care, nutritional and exercise therapy, behavioral health support, and optional anti-obesity pharmacotherapy. Program delivery was supported by connected home scales, telehealth visits, and a data-driven care coordination platform. Primary outcomes included percent weight loss sustained at ≥18 months, cardiometabolic markers (HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol), and reimbursement metrics. A subanalysis was conducted on 792 patients across one cardiology practice to assess financial performance.

Results

At ≥18 months, the cohort achieved a mean weight loss of 41 lbs (15.3%). Over 70% of long-term enrollees maintained ≥10% weight loss, and more than 40% achieved ≥15% loss. When stratified by pharmacotherapy, participants receiving GLP-1RA (61.4% of the cohort), non–GLP-1 AOMs (12.4%), or no pharmacotherapy (11.0%) demonstrated clinically meaningful weight loss at both thresholds. Cardiometabolic parameters improved significantly: HbA1c (-1.1%), systolic blood pressure (-8 mmHg), and LDL cholesterol (-14 mg/dL). In the financial subanalysis, 83% of claims were reimbursed, with an average collection of $311 per patient per month, translating into a new service line for the practice with $3 million in annualized revenue.

Weight loss by treatment group: GLP-1RA, non-GLP medications, and behavioral therapy alone
GLP-1RA achieved the greatest weight loss (16.7%), followed by non-GLP medications (11.9%), with behavioral therapy alone slightly lower (10.3%), all showing clinically meaningful reductions.
Improvements in blood sugar, blood pressure, and cholesterol following the program
Weight loss from this program not only reduced pounds, but also improved blood sugar, blood pressure, and cholesterol.
Distribution of treatment strategies across the cohort
Among participants, 61% received GLP-1 receptor agonists (including Semaglutide, other GLP-1s, or combinations with other anti-obesity medications), 12% received non–GLP-1 pharmacotherapy (such as phentermine, naltrexone, or bupropion), and 11% received no pharmacotherapy. Clinically meaningful weight loss was observed across all treatment strategies, demonstrating that the program is effective for patients on medications or behavioral interventions alone.

Discussion

The greatest barrier to cardiovascular risk reduction in obese patients is not the lack of effective treatments, but the lack of a structured system to deliver them. This study shows that embedding obesity care within cardiology practices enables patients to achieve sustained weight loss, including ≥15% loss for over 40% of participants, and meaningful improvements in blood pressure, cholesterol, and HbA1c. Notably, even patients not on pharmacotherapy achieved clinically significant results, highlighting the power of a coordinated, digital-first, multidisciplinary approach. Beyond patient outcomes, the program generates substantial revenue, demonstrating that obesity management can be both an essential and financially sustainable pillar of modern cardiovascular care.

Conclusion

Embedding a digital, multidisciplinary obesity platform within cardiology practices produced sustained weight loss and meaningful cardiometabolic improvements while generating a financially sustainable new service line. The model offers cardiology practices a scalable approach to deliver effective obesity care alongside core cardiovascular prevention.